Net Rating#10
-1.6
Off Rating#10
105.2
Def Rating#11
106.8
Pace#12
79.3
TS%#10
54.5
eFG%#12
48.2
TOV%#4
16.1

Projected Wins

Projected finish range based on the remaining schedule and team strength.

35 games left

Proj Wins

17.7

P10-P90

14.1–21.1

Playoff Odds

8%

Mean Seed

10.9

Net Rating Trend

Month-to-month swings show whether the team is stabilizing, slipping, or peaking late.

Best -1.6Worst -1.6
0.0May

Pythagorean Record

ORtg¹⁴ ÷ (ORtg¹⁴ + DRtg¹⁴)

Actual

2-7

Expected

4-5

-2 vs expected · Performing in line with point differential

Scoring Style

Shot location and free-throw pressure compared with a league-average offense.

3PT Share
Lg 36.6%36.9%
Paint Share
Lg 51.6%50.8%
Mid-Range
Lg 11.8%12.2%
Free Throw Rate
Lg 33.5%39%
Pace
#12 · Average79.3

Team DNA

A quick shape of where this team leans relative to the rest of the league.

OffenseShootingOff RebDefenseStopsPressure
hover axis for detail · dashed = league avg
PHXLeague Avg

Four Factors

The possession battle: shooting, turnovers, rebounding, and free throws.

vertical tick = league avg

Offense

eFG%
50.648.2
TOV%
18.016.1
ORB%
30.826.2
FTr
33.139.0

Defense

eFG%
50.652.9
TOV%
18.018.2
ORB%
30.829.5
FTr
33.128.1

Roster Construction

How production is distributed across the rotation in minutes, scoring, rebounds, and assists.

Minutes Distribution

14players
Copper14%Thomas14%Nogic9%Makani10%Mack10%Bonner11%Williams5%Brochant8%

Production Breakdown

Points97.3/gm
Rebounds38.0/gm
Assists22.8/gm

Clutch Performance

Close-game results only, meant to show how this team finishes when the margin stays tight.

SituationGPW-LW%Avg Margin
Close (≤5 pts)20-2.000+3.0
Mid (6-12 pts)51-4.200+8.4
Blowout (13+ pts)21-1.500+24.5
Overall92-7.222+10.8
Clutch differential: -22.2% vs overall W% · Struggles to close — underperforms in tight games

Identity Signals

shot mix, rotation usage, matchup patterns, and game-level context

Shot Identity

Paint-first offense

Weighted zone accuracy edge: -1.0 percentage points versus league averages.

3PT share

36.9%

Paint share

50.8%

Mid-range

12.2%

Context Splits

Road edge

Need at least two monthly points to measure directional change.

Home NET

-3.7

Away NET

+0.1

Close-game edge

-22.2%

Matchup Map

Recurring opponents only

Best recurring matchup: New York Liberty (0-2). Toughest: New York Liberty (0-2).

Best

NYL -8.5

Worst

NYL -8.5

Opponents

8

Rotation Shape

Distributed rotation

Concentration numbers are computed directly from season-to-date player rates on the current roster view.

Top 3 minutes

36.6%

Top 2 scoring

36.1%

Top 2 assists

44.7%

Projected Wins Distribution

Model range for the final record when projection data exists for this season.

Simulation range
9101112131415161718192021222324252610th50th90thplayoffprobability

Median Wins

18.12

10th-90th

14.120000000000001–21.12

Playoff %

8%

Mean Seed

10.9

Projected finish range based on the remaining schedule and team strength.

Team Page Stat Guide

These are the terms that show up most often on the team overview, split tables, projection cards, and shot chart.

ORtg / DRtg / NET

Estimated points scored, allowed, and the difference per 100 possessions.

TS%

True shooting percentage. Includes the efficiency value of free throws and threes.

eFG%

Effective field goal percentage. Rewards three-point makes more than two-point makes.

TOV%

Turnover percentage. Lower is better on offense; higher is better when forced on defense.

Pythagorean Record

Expected record from scoring margin rather than actual close-game results.

Playoff Odds

Model-estimated chance of finishing in the top eight and reaching the playoffs.

Mean Seed

Average projected playoff seed from the simulation output when a projection file exists.

Identity Signals

Real-data summaries built from shot zones, schedule context, H2H results, and roster concentration.

Shot Chart vs Lg Avg

Shows whether the team shoots better or worse than league average from each zone.