Four Factors Framework
2026-27 regular season · 15 teams
Based on Basketball on Paper — Dean Oliver, 2004
How the Model Works
Dean Oliver identified four key factors that explain ~90% of a team's offensive and defensive efficiency. Each factor has an empirically-derived weight. The same four factors apply to both offense and defense — giving you 8 levers total.
Offense
Defense
2026-27 Factor Leaders
Click headers to sort · Score = weighted composite
| # | Team | W-L | Net ▼ | eFG% | TOV% | ORB% | FTr | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GSVGolden State Valkyries | 29-11 | +9.5 | 50.6 | 15.0 | 32.2 | 27.3 | 55 #6 |
| 2 | MINMinnesota Lynx | 31-9 | +9.4 | 54.8 | 16.2 | 32.1 | 25.2 | 62 #2 |
| 3 | INDIndiana Fever | 26-14 | +7.6 | 56.8 | 17.3 | 31.5 | 33.0 | 72 #1 |
| 4 | ATLAtlanta Dream | 26-14 | +6.1 | 50.2 | 17.1 | 36.5 | 34.5 | 59 #4 |
| 5 | LVALas Vegas Aces | 27-13 | +4.9 | 54.4 | 15.2 | 26.4 | 29.7 | 60 #3 |
| 6 | DALDallas Wings | 24-16 | +4.5 | 52.5 | 15.0 | 30.9 | 26.4 | 58 #5 |
| 7 | NYLNew York Liberty | 24-16 | +3.6 | 53.7 | 18.0 | 31.2 | 31.4 | 54 #7 |
| 8 | WASWashington Mystics | 24-16 | -0.7 | 49.7 | 19.8 | 35.1 | 38.6 | 44 #8 |
| 9 | CHIChicago Sky | 15-25 | -3.4 | 49.5 | 15.9 | 27.3 | 33.2 | 42 #9 |
| 10 | PHXPhoenix Mercury | 14-26 | -3.9 | 50.4 | 17.0 | 26.9 | 35.6 | 42 #10 |
| 11 | PDXPortland Fire | 16-24 | -5.3 | 52.9 | 18.5 | 29.3 | 26.8 | 39 #12 |
| 12 | LASLos Angeles Sparks | 15-25 | -5.3 | 52.8 | 18.2 | 27.1 | 29.4 | 39 #13 |
| 13 | SEASeattle Storm | 8-32 | -6.4 | 48.5 | 18.1 | 29.6 | 27.8 | 26 #15 |
| 14 | TORToronto Tempo | 11-29 | -9.7 | 51.2 | 17.9 | 29.2 | 31.3 | 40 #11 |
| 15 | CONConnecticut Sun | 10-30 | -10.9 | 46.6 | 17.9 | 31.7 | 31.5 | 27 #14 |
Factor Rankings — All Teams
Bars: longest = best · dashed line = league avg
Offense
Defense
Offensive Factors vs. Net Rating
Green = positive net · orange line = trend · r = Pearson correlation
Eff. FG% vs Net
3-pointer counts 1.5× a made 2. Single biggest driver of offense.
TOV Rate vs Net
Turnovers per 100 possessions. Fewer = more scoring opportunities.
Off. Reb% vs Net
Offensive rebounding rate. Second chances create easy buckets.
FT Rate vs Net
FTA per FGA. Free throws are unblockable, high-value scoring.
Team Four-Factor Profile
Golden State Valkyries
29-11 · Net +9.5
#6
Off · 55
#1
Def · 79
Hover dots for details · Outer ring = best in league
| Factor | Value | Rank | Grade | vs Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Offense | ||||
| Eff. FG% | 50.6 | #9 | B | -1.0 |
| TOV Rate | 15.0 | #1 | A+ | +2.1 |
| Off. Reb% | 32.2 | #3 | B+ | +1.7 |
| FT Rate | 27.3 | #12 | D | -3.1 |
Defense | ||||
| Opp. eFG% | 48.3 | #1 | A+ | +3.3 |
| Opp. TOV Rate | 19.1 | #2 | A+ | +2.0 |
| Opp. Off. Reb% | 30.8 | #8 | B | -0.3 |
| Opp. FT Rate | 32.4 | #10 | B | -2.0 |
Grade scale: A+ (top 17%) · A (top 33%) · B+ (top 50%) · B (top 67%) · C (top 83%) · D (bottom 17%)